Red meat


In the context of nutrition, red meat is defined as meat obtained from mammals, including beef, pork, lamb/mutton, veal, and venison. Red meat does not necessarily appear red in color.
Red meat is a good source of protein, iron, zinc, and vitamins B1, B2, B6, and B12. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), unprocessed red meat probably causes cancer, particularly colorectal cancer. Studies have also linked red meat with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. If meat is processed, such as by salting, curing, or smoking, health risks further increase. Processed meat is known to cause colorectal cancer. The World Cancer Research Fund recommends minimizing consumption of processed meat and limiting red meat to no more than three portions per week, which is equivalent to about 350–500g (12–18oz) cooked weight.
In culinary contexts, the term red meat is used more loosely to refer to meat that is red when raw.
Definition
| Aged beef | 1.50 – 2.00% | Red meat |
| Beef | 0.40 – 1.00% | Red meat |
| Pork | 0.10 – 0.30% | Red meat |
| Veal | 0.10 – 0.30% | Red meat |
| Turkey thigh | 0.25 – 0.30% | Dark meat |
| Chicken thigh | 0.18 – 0.20% | Dark meat |
| Turkey breast | 0.008% | White meat |
| Chicken breast | 0.005% | White meat |

In the context of nutritional science, red meat is defined as meat obtained from mammals, including beef, pork, lamb, mutton, veal, venison, and goat. Some sources also specify that the meat must be muscle meat, as opposed to organ meat. Red meat does not necessarily appear red in color.
In culinary contexts, the term red meat is used more loosely to refer to meat that is red when raw. The term is used to refer to adult or "gamey" mammals, while that from young mammals (rabbit, veal, lamb) is white. Most poultry is white. Game is sometimes put in a separate category altogether («viandes noires» ). The redness of meat comes from its myoglobin content.
Some cuts of pork are considered white under the gastronomic definition, but all pork is considered red meat in nutritional studies. The National Pork Board has positioned it as "the other white meat", profiting from the ambiguity to suggest that pork has the nutritional properties of white meat, which is considered more healthful.
Ostrich, emu, and rhea meat are sometimes referred to as types of red meat or "alternatives to red meat" . However, their nutritional characteristics differ significantly from the characteristics of other types of red meat.
Nutrition
Red meat contains large amounts of iron, creatine, minerals such as zinc and phosphorus, and B-vitamins: (niacin, vitamin B12, thiamin and riboflavin). Red meat is a source of lipoic acid.
Red meat contains small amounts of vitamin D. Offal such as liver contains much higher quantities than other parts of the animal.
Health effects
Beef#Health impactOverall, diets high in red and processed meats are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer (particularly colorectal cancer), and all-cause mortality. The body of epidemiological data showing their associations with T2D, CVD, and cancer is large and consistent.
The associations are strongest for processed meat, which is meat that has undergone salting, curing, fermentation, smoking, or other processes to enhance flavor or improve preservation, such as bacon, ham, salami, pepperoni, hot dogs, and some sausages.
A 2025 umbrella review found that a high intake of red meat is associated with an increased all-cause mortality risk.
There are no long-term randomized controlled trials that have investigated red meat consumption and disease outcomes, and such trials are unlikely to be conducted due to ethical, financial and practical reasons. Most of the data on red meat and health effects is from long-term epidemiological studies.
Cancer
In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified unprocessed red meat as "probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)". To make this classification, the IARC Working Group assessed over 800 epidemiological studies in addition to other types of studies such as animal bioassays. When assessing whether substances are carcinogenic to humans, it is rare for data from randomized trials to be available.
The Working Group found "limited" epidemiological evidence linking unprocessed red meat to colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. Additionally, it found "strong mechanistic evidence" that unprocessed red meat is carcinogenic. Mechanistic evidence is evidence of plausible biological pathways in which a substance could cause cancer. For instance, studies had found that participants who had recently eaten red meat had higher levels of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds in their guts and feces.
For processed red meat, evidence of harm is stronger. The IARC classified processed meat as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on "sufficient evidence in humans that the consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer."
The American Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK and World Cancer Research Fund International have supported these conclusions. More recent meta-analyses have further supported the finding that high consumption of red meat is associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer.
Increase in cancer risk
The IARC concluded that if unprocessed red meat does cause cancer, there is a 17% higher risk of colorectal cancer for every 100 g of unprocessed red meat consumed daily. It found a 18% higher risk of colorectal cancer for every 50 g of processed red meat consumed daily.
A 2021 umbrella review reported an increase of 11–51% risk of multiple cancer per 100g/d increment of red meat, and an increase of 8-72% risk of multiple cancer per 50g/d increment of processed meat.
A 2022 Burden of Proof study analyzed data from epidemiological evidence (not mechanistic evidence) and found that each 100 g of unprocessed red meat consumed per day would increase colorectal cancer risk by at least 6% and breast cancer by at least 3%. The Burden of Proof methodology was later criticized for systematically under-estimating levels of risk.
Mechanisms
Heme iron in red meat has been associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The American Institute for Cancer Research and World Cancer Research Fund have commented that "haem iron, which is present at high levels in red meat, has been shown to promote colorectal tumorigenesis by stimulating the endogenous formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compound." N-Glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) has also been suggested as a mechanism. 
A 2017 literature review indicated there are numerous potential carcinogens of colorectal tissue in red meat, particularly those in processed red meat products, such as N-nitroso compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and heterocyclic amines (HCAs). Cooking meat with "high-temperature methods, such as pan frying or grilling directly over an open flame", also causes formation of PAHs and HCAs.
Cooking methods
Meats cooked at high temperatures, especially above 300F (as in grilling or pan frying), or that are cooked for a long time tend to form more HCAs. Cooking methods that expose meat to smoke contribute to PAH formation. Using a microwave oven to cook meat prior to exposure to high temperatures can substantially reduce HCA formation by reducing the time that meat must be in contact with high heat to finish cooking.
Meat that is cooked longer and at higher temperatures is associated with a 4.62 times greater risk of breast cancer compared with rare or medium-done meat.
Cardiovascular disease
Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease
Red meat consumption is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, high blood pressure and stroke. Factors associated with increased stroke risk from consuming red meat include saturated fats that increase levels of blood cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and heme iron, which may precipitate atherogenesis in cerebral arteries, leading to stroke.
In 2020, the National Heart Foundation of New Zealand Expert Nutrition Policy (ENP) issued a position statement that concluded that high consumption of red meat increases risk of heart disease and stroke by 16%.
Diabetes
Processed and unprocessed red meat consumption is a risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes across populations.
A 2017 review found that daily consumption of 85 grams of red meat and 35 grams of processed red meat products by European and American consumers increased their risk of type 2 diabetes by 18–36%, while a diet of abstinence of red meat consuming whole grains, vegetables, fruits, and dairy was associated with an 81% reduced risk of diabetes. One study estimated that "substitutions of one serving of nuts, low-fat dairy, and whole grains per day for one serving of red meat per day were associated with a 16–35% lower risk of type 2 diabetes". A 2022 umbrella review found that consuming an additional 100g of red meat per day was associated with a 17% increased risk of type 2 diabetes.
Inflammatory bowel disease
High red and processed meat consumption is associated with an increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease. The American Gastroenterological Association have stated that a diet low in red and processed meat may reduce ulcerative colitis flares.
Industry funding
A 2025 review found that nutritional studies on red meat consumption funded by the meat industry reported favorable (20.7%) or neutral (79.3%) cardiovascular outcomes for red meat intake. This was in opposition to independent studies that reported unfavourable (73.3%) or neutral (26.7%) cardiovascular outcomes. The review concluded that "most studies without conflicts of interest with the red meat industry suggested an unfavorable effect of unprocessed red meat consumption on risk factors for cardiovascular disease".
Dietary guidelines
The World Cancer Research Fund recommends limiting red meat to no more than three servings per week.
In 2011, the USDA launched MyPlate, which did not distinguish between kinds of meat, but did recommend eating at least 8oz of fish each week. In 2011, the Harvard School of Public Health launched the Healthy Eating Plate in part because of the perceived inadequacies of the USDA's recommendations. The Healthy Eating Plate encourages consumers to avoid processed meat and limit red meat consumption to twice a week because of links to heart disease, diabetes, and colon cancer. To replace these meats it recommends consuming fish, poultry, beans, or nuts.
The National Heart Foundation of New Zealand recommends that one should aim to reduce consumption of red meat below 350g per week and replace meat with plant sources of protein.
The European Association for the Study of Diabetes recommends that diabetics minimise the consumption of red meat.
References
- Is Pork Red Meat? And Is It Healthy?, 24 September 2025, Cleveland Clinic, en
- Meinilä, Jelena, Virtanen, Jyrki K., 21 February 2024, Meat and meat products – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023, Food & Nutrition Research, 68, en, 10.29219/fnr.v68.10538, 1654-661X, 10916397, 38449706
- 26 October 2015, Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat, 23 September 2025, World Health Organization, en
- Shi, Wenming, Huang, Xin, Schooling, C. Mary, Zhao, Jie V., 21 July 2023, Red meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, European Heart Journal, 44, 28, 2626–2635, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad336, 1522-9645, 37264855
- Chunxiao, Li, Tom R. P., Bishop, Fumiaki, Imamura, Stephen J., Sharp, Matthew, Pearce, Soren, Brage, et al, 1 September 2024, Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100 000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, English, 12, 9, 619–630, 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00179-7, 2213-8587, 39174161
- Limit consumption of red and processed meat , , Recommendation evidence, 24 September 2025, World Cancer Research Fund, en-GB
- White Meat, thefreedictionary.com
- 16 May 2008, USDA-Safety of Fresh Pork...from Farm to Table, live, 18 September 2013, 16 September 2009, Fsis.usda.gov
- Çelen, Mehmet Fatih, Söğüt, Bünyamin, Zorba, Ömer, Demirulus, Hüsrev, Tekeli, Ahmet, August 2016, Comparison of normal and PSE turkey breast meat for chemical composition, pH, color, myoglobin, and drip loss, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, en, 45, 8, 441–444, 10.1590/S1806-92902016000800003, 1516-3598, free
- Penner KP, Clarke MP, September 1990, Red Meats: Nutrient Contributions to the Diet, Iowa State Animal Science, 16 September 2009, live, 24 March 2009
- 26 October 2015, Cancer: Carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat, 23 September 2025, World Health Organization, en
- Micha, Renata, Wallace, Sarah K., Mozaffarian, Dariush, 17 May 2010, Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes Mellitus, Circulation, 121, 21, 2271–2283, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924977, 20479151, 2885952
- IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 1. EXPOSURE DATA, 2018, Red Meat and Processed Meat, 23 September 2025, International Agency for Research on Cancer, en, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 114
- 22 September 2020, Are ratites "red" or "white" meat?, AskUSDA, US Department of Agriculture, 17 July 2019
- 10 October 2014, The color of meat depends on myoglobin: Part 1, 24 August 2023, MSU Extension, en-us
- Dougherty, Philip H., vanc, 15 January 1987, Dressing Pork for Success, 14 February 2017, The New York Times
- Hall, Trish, vanc, 13 November 1991, And This Little Piggy Is Now on the Menu, 14 February 2017, The New York Times
- Al-Khalifa, H., Al-Naser, A., 1 December 2014, Ostrich meat: Production, quality parameters, and nutritional comparison to other types of meats1, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23, 4, 784–790, 10.3382/japr.2014-00962, 1056-6171, free
- Horbańczuk, Olaf K., Wierzbicka, Agnieszka, 1 September 2016, Technological and nutritional properties of ostrich, emu, and rhea meat quality, Journal of Veterinary Research, 60, 3, 279–286, 10.1515/jvetres-2016-0043, 2450-8608, free
- Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Red Meats: Nutrient Contributions to the Diet, September 1990, 12 September 2006
- Williams PG, September 2007, University of Wollongong, Nutritional composition of red meat, 10 March 2011
- Schmid A, Walther B, Natural vitamin D content in animal products, Advances in Nutrition, 4, 4, 453–62, July 2013, 23858093, 3941824, 10.3945/an.113.003780
- Abete, Itziar, Romaguera, Dora, Vieira, Ana Rita, Munain, Adolfo Lopez de, Norat, Teresa, Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies, British Journal of Nutrition, September 2014, 112, 5, 762–775, 10.1017/S000711451400124X, 24932617, 14401281, en, 0007-1145, free
- Neuenschwander, Manuela, Ballon, Aurélie, Weber, Katharina S., Norat, Teresa, Aune, Dagfinn, Schwingshackl, Lukas, Schlesinger, Sabrina, Role of diet in type 2 diabetes incidence: umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies, BMJ, 3 July 2019, 366, l2368, 10.1136/bmj.l2368, 31270064, 6607211, en, 0959-8138
- Mozaffarian, Dariush, Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity, Circulation, 12 January 2016, 133, 2, 187–225, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018585, 26746178, 4814348
- Qian, Frank, Riddle, Matthew C., Wylie-Rosett, Judith, Hu, Frank B., 2020, Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong is the Evidence?, Diabetes Care, 43, 2, 265–271, 10.2337/dci19-0063, 6971786, 31959642
- IARC Monographs evaluate consumption of red meat and processed meat, 26 October 2015, live, 10 November 2015, Press release No. 240, International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Onni AT, Balakrishna R, Perillo M, Amato M, Javadi Arjmand E, Thomassen LM, Lorenzini A, Fadnes LT, 2025, Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Consumption of Different Food Groups and Risk of All-cause Mortality, Advances in Nutrition, 16, 4, 100393, 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100393, 11931306, 39956388
- Meinilä J, Virtanen JK, 2024, Meat and meat products – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023, Food Nutr Res, 21, 10.29219/fnr.v68.10538, 10916397, 38449706
- 2018, Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer, live, 27 December 2024, World Cancer Research Fund, en-GB
- 1 October 2015, Q&A on the carcinogenicity of the consumption of red meat and processed meat, 7 August 2019, World Health Organization
- Red Meat and Processed Meat, 25 September 2025, IARC Publications, International Agency for Research on Cancer
- Red Meat and Processed Meat, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2018, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, 114, Lyon, France
- 25 June 2019, Does eating processed and red meat cause cancer?, 30 December 2022, Cancer Research UK, en
- Red Meat (Beef, Pork, Lamb): Increases Risk of Colorectal Cancer, 30 December 2022, American Institute for Cancer Research, en-US
- Limit red and processed meat, 30 December 2022, WCRF International, en-US
- Poorolajal J, Mohammadi Y, Fattahi-Darghlou M, Almasi-Moghadam F, 2024, The association between major gastrointestinal cancers and red and processed meat and fish consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the observational studies, PLOS ONE, 19, 6, e0305994, 2024PLoSO..1905994P, 10.1371/journal.pone.0305994, 11207151, 38924054, free
- Di Y, Ding L, Gao L, Huang H, 2023, Association of meat consumption with the risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Cancer, 23, 1, 782, 10.1186/s12885-023-11218-1, 10463360, 37612616, free
- Huang Y, Cao D, Chen Z, Chen B, Li J, Guo J, Dong Q, Liu L, Wei Q, September 2021, Red and processed meat consumption and cancer outcomes: Umbrella review, Food Chem, Review, 356, 129697, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129697, 33838606
- 5, Lescinsky H, Afshin A, Ashbaugh C, Bisignano C, Brauer M, Ferrara G, Hay SI, He J, Iannucci V, Marczak LB, McLaughlin SA, Mullany EC, Parent MC, Serfes AL, Sorensen RJ, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Murray CJ, October 2022, Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study, Nat Med, Systematic review, 28, 10, 2075–2082, 10.1038/s41591-022-01968-z, 9556326, 36216940
- Glenn, Andrea J., Gu, Xiao, Hu, Frank B., Wang, Molin, Willett, Walter C., April 2023, Concerns about the Burden of Proof studies, Nature Medicine, en, 29, 4, 823–825, 10.1038/s41591-023-02294-8, 1546-170X, 10129864, 37059835
- Cancer Prev. Res., 2011, 4, 2, 177–184, 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0113, Heme iron from meat and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and a review of the mechanisms involved, Bastide, N. M., Pierre, F. H., Corpet, D. E., 21209396, 4951579, live, 25 September 2015
- Demeyer, D., Mertens, B., De Smet, S., Ulens, M., 2016, Mechanisms Linking Colorectal Cancer to the Consumption of (Processed) Red Meat: A Review, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56, 16, 2747–2766, 10.1080/10408398.2013.873886, 25975275, 1854/LU-8518004, free
- Wang, J., Shewell, L.K., Day, C.J., Jennings, M.P., 2023, N-glycolylneuraminic acid as a carbohydrate cancer biomarker, Translational Oncology, 31, 101643, 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101643, 36805917, 9971276, 10072/428860, free
- Liang, M., Wu, J., Li, H., Zhu, Q., 2024, N-glycolylneuraminic acid in red meat and processed meat is a health concern: A review on the formation, health risk, and reduction, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 32, 2, e13314, 10.1111/1541-4337.13314, 38389429
- Jeyakumar A, Dissabandara L, Gopalan V, A critical overview on the biological and molecular features of red and processed meat in colorectal carcinogenesis, Journal of Gastroenterology, 52, 4, 407–418, April 2017, 27913919, 10.1007/s00535-016-1294-x, 20865644
- Chemicals in Meat Cooked at High Temperatures and Cancer Risk, National Cancer Institute, live, 6 November 2011, 2018
- 2 April 2018, Chemicals in Meat Cooked at High Temperatures and Cancer Risk - NCI, 26 September 2025, National Cancer Institute
- Zheng, W., Gustafson, D. R., Sinha, R., Cerhan, J. R., Moore, D., Hong, C. P., Anderson, K. E., Kushi, L. H., Sellers, T. A., Folsom, A. R., 18 November 1998, Well-done meat intake and the risk of breast cancer, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90, 22, 1724–1729, 10.1093/jnci/90.22.1724, 0027-8874, 9827527
- Farvid, Maryam S., Sidahmed, Elkhansa, Spence, Nicholas D., Mante Angua, Kingsly, Rosner, Bernard A., Barnett, Junaidah B., 1 September 2021, Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, European Journal of Epidemiology, en, 36, 9, 937–951, 10.1007/s10654-021-00741-9, 1573-7284, 34455534, subscription
- Zhang X, Liang S, Chen X, Yang J, Zhou Y, Du L, Li K, Red/processed meat consumption and noncancer-related outcomes in humans: Umbrella review, Br J Nutr, 130, 3, 484–494, December 2022, 36545687, 10.1017/S0007114522003415, free
- Kim K, Hyeon J, Lee SA, Kwon SO, Lee H, Keum N, Lee JK, Park SM, 6, Role of Total, Red, Processed, and White Meat Consumption in Stroke Incidence and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies, Journal of the American Heart Association, 6, 9, e005983, August 2017, 28855166, 5634267, 10.1161/jaha.117.005983
- Wenming Shi, Xin Huang, C Mary Schooling, Jie V Zhao, 2023, Red meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, European Heart Journal, 44, 28, 2626–2635, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad336, 37264855, free
- Giosuè A, Calabrese I, Riccardi G, Vaccaro O, Vitale M, Consumption of different animal-based foods and risk of type 2 diabetes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective studies, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 191, 110071, September 2022, 36067917, 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110071, 252107061
- Li C, Bishop TR, Imamura F, Sharp SJ, Pearce M, Brage S, Ong KK, Ahsan H, Bes-Rastrollo M, Beulens JW, den Braver N, Byberg L, Canhada S, Chen Z, Chung HF, Cortés-Valencia A, Djousse L, Drouin-Chartier JP, Du H, Du S, Duncan BB, Gaziano JM, Gordon-Larsen P, Goto A, Haghighatdoost F, Härkänen T, Hashemian M, Hu FB, Ittermann T, Järvinen R, Kakkoura MG, Neelakantan N, Knekt P, Lajous M, Li Y, Magliano DJ, Malekzadeh R, Le Marchand L, Marques-Vidal P, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Maskarinec G, Mishra GD, Mohammadifard N, O'Donoghue G, O'Gorman D, Popkin B, Poustchi H, Sarrafzadegan N, Sawada N, Schmidt MI, Shaw JE, Soedamah-Muthu S, Stern D, Tong L, van Dam RM, Völzke H, Willett WC, Wolk A, Yu C, 2024, Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100 000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 12, 9, 619–630, 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00179-7, 39174161
- Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Lampousi AM, Knüppel S, Iqbal K, Schwedhelm C, Bechthold A, Schlesinger S, Boeing H, 6, Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, European Journal of Epidemiology, 32, 5, 363–375, May 2017, 28397016, 5506108, 10.1007/s10654-017-0246-y
- Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM, Schulze MB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB, Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 94, 4, 1088–96, October 2011, 21831992, 3173026, 10.3945/ajcn.111.018978
- Zhang, Xingxia, Liang, Shiqi, Chen, Xinrong, Yang, Jie, Zhou, Yong, Du, Liang, Li, Ka, n.d., Red/processed meat consumption and noncancer-related outcomes in humans: Umbrella review, British Journal of Nutrition, 130, 3, en, 484–494, 10.1017/S0007114522003415, 36545687, 0007-1145, free
- Talebi S, Zeraattalab-Motlagh S, Rahimlou M, Naeini F, Ranjbar M, Talebi A, Mohammadi H, 2023, The Association between Total Protein, Animal Protein, and Animal Protein Sources with Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies, Advances in Nutrition, 14, 4, 752–761, 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.05.008, 37187455, 10334156
- Christensen C, Knudsen A, Arnesen EK, Hatlebakk JG, Sletten IS, Fadnes LT, 2024, Diet, Food, and Nutritional Exposures and Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Progression of Disease: an Umbrella Review, Advances in Nutrition, 15, 5, 100219, 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100219, 38599319, 11063602
- Hashash JG, Elkins J, Lewis JD, Binion DG, 2024, AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diet and Nutritional Therapies in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review, Gastroenterology, 166, 3, 521–532, 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.11.303, 38276922
- López-Moreno M, Fresán U, Marchena-Giráldez C, Bertotti G, Roldán-Ruiz A, 2025, Industry study sponsorship and conflicts of interest on the effect of unprocessed red meat on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review of clinical trials, Am J Clin Nutr, 121, 6, S0002-9165(25)00126-1, 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.030, 40379522, subscription
- 2012, Food Pyramids: What Should You Really Eat, 16 April 2009, Harvard School of Public Health
- MyPlate Protein foods, 16 January 2013, USDA
- Aas, Anne-Marie, Axelsen, Mette, Churuangsuk, Chaitong, Hermansen, Kjeld, Kendall, Cyril W. C., Kahleova, Hana, Khan, Tauseef, Lean, Michael E. J., Mann, Jim I., Pedersen, Eva, Pfeiffer, Andreas, Rahelić, Dario, Reynolds, Andrew N., Risérus, Ulf, Rivellese, Angela Albarosa, Salas-Salvadó, Jordi, Schwab, Ursula, Sievenpiper, John L., Thanopoulou, Anastasia, Uusitupa, Emeritus Matti, April 2023, Evidence-based European recommendations for the dietary management of diabetes, Diabetologia, 66, 6, 965–985, 10.1007/s00125-023-05894-8, 37069434, free
External links
- Meat in your diet - NHS
Category:IARC Group 2A carcinogens
Category:Meat
sv:Kött#Rött och vitt kött